
by David Bronner, president of Dr. Bronner's
Michael Specter's recent articles in the New Yorker bashing Vandana Shiva and the labeling of genetically engineered foods ("Seeds of Doubt"and "The Problem with G.M.O. Labels") are the latest high-profile pro-genetically modified organisms (GMO) articles that fail to engage with the fundamental critique of genetically engineered food crops in U.S. soil today: Rather than reduce pesticide inputs, GMOs are causing them to skyrocket in amount and toxicity.
Setting the record straight, Ramon J. Seidler, PhD, former senior scientist for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), has recently published a well-researched article documenting the devastating facts, "Pesticide Use on Genetically Engineered Crops," in Environmental Working Group's online AgMag. Seidler's article cites and links recent scientific literature and media reports, and should be required reading for all journalists covering GMOs as well as for citizens seeking to understand why their right to know if food is genetically engineered is so important. The short discussion below summarizes the major points of his five-page article.
The crops on more than 99 percent of GMO acreage have been engineered by chemical companies to tolerate heavy herbicide (glyphosate) use and/or produce insecticide (Bt) in every cell of every plant over the entire growing season. The result is massive selection pressure that has rapidly created pest resistance--the opposite of integrated pest management, where judicious use of chemical controls is applied only as necessary. Predictably, just as overuse of antibiotics in confined factory farms has created resistant "supergerms" and lead to animals being overdosed with ever more powerful antibiotics, we now have huge swaths of the country infested with "superweeds" and "superbugs" resistant to glyphosate and Bt, meaning a greater volume of more toxic pesticides is being applied.
For example, the use of systemic insecticides, which coat GMO corn and soy seeds and are incorporated and expressed inside the entire plant, has skyrocketed in the last 10 years. This includes use of neonicotinoids (neonics), which are extremely powerful neurotoxins that contaminate our food and water and destroy non-target pollinators and wildlife such as bees, butterflies, and birds. In fact, two neonics in widespread use in the U.S. are currently banned in the EU because of their suspected link to colony collapse disorder in bees.
Mainstream pro-GMO media also fail to discuss the ever-increasing amount of older, much more toxic herbicides like 2,4-D and dicamba being sprayed along with huge volumes of glyphosate to deal with superweeds. Most importantly and egregiously, this biased reporting does not mention the imminent approval of the pesticide industry's next generation of herbicide-tolerant crops, which are resistant not only to glyphosate, but also to high doses of 2,4-D and dicamba. Their approval will lead to huge increases in the amounts of these toxic chemicals being sprayed on our food and farming communities.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture and the EPA are in the process of rubber-stamping these into our farming communities (and--unlabeled--onto our dinner plates) this fall. Yet pro-GMO media consistently fail to discuss their imminent approval even as they tout the lower-toxicity profile of glyphosate. Such reporting gives a pass to the pesticide industry that pours millions into lobbying government and media elites and defeating voter ballot initiatives to require labeling of GMO foods.
Hopefully, Seidler's article will be widely read and disseminated so reporters can learn the facts and check their biases against industry-fed distortions. Consumers need to hear the fundamental concern that GMOs are doubling down on, not freeing us from, the pesticide treadmill that contaminates our food and water while lining the pockets of the chemical companies that make both the GMOs and the pesticides used on them.

For more from Maria Rodale, visit www.mariasfarmcountrykitchen.com